EPA v. SAGEM, INC.
Case summary
COMPLAINT FILED 9/29/99 PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $64,139. COMPLAINT ALLEGES: COUNT I RESPONDENT FAILED TO SUBMIT A FORM FOR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1997 BY JULY 1, 1998. IN VIOLATION OF EPCRA SECTION 313. COUNT II RESPONDENT FAILED TO SUBMIT A FORM R FOR 1, 1, 1- TRICHLOROETHANE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BY 9/8/97. IN VIOLATION OF EPCRA SECTION 313 COUNT III RESPONDENT DID NOT SUBMIT A FORMR COVERING 1,1,1-TRICHLORO- ETHANE FOR ITS GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA FACILITY TO THE ADMINISTRATOR OF EPA NOR TO THE OFFICIAL DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1995 BY 8/1/96. IN VIOLATION OF EPCRA SECTION 313. CACO ISSUED 1/24/2000 ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $9,621. RESPONDENT SHALL MAKE PAYMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS. RESPONDEN RESPONDENT ALSO AGREES TO COMPLETE A SEP.
Defendants (1)
- SAGEM, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
SAGEM INCORPORATED
5150 PELHAM RD., GREENVILLE, SC, 29615
Registry ID: 110015681074
Statutes cited
- EPCRA 313 — Toxic Chemical Release Reporting (TRI)
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SAGEM, INC.entered 2000-01-24
Primary law: EPCRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 1999-09-29Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1999-10-08Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2000-01-24Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 23380
- Case number
- 04-1999-0526
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- RCRA
- EPA region
- 04
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Toxic Chemical Release Reporting (TRI)
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-1999-0526 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.