EPA v. FROST AUTO ALIGNMENT

Case summary

COMPLAINT FILED 3/8/99 PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $19,250 COMPLAINT ALLEGES: RESPONDENT USED AN UNACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANT IN TH E SERVICING OF AN MVAC. IN VIOLATION OF THE CAA SECTION 82.174(D). COUNT II RESPONDENT FAILED TO CERTIFY TO THE ADMINISTRATOR THAT RESPONDENT HAS ACQUIRED, AND IS PROPERLY USING, APPROVED EQUIPMENT AND THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL AUTHORIZED TO USE THE EQUIPMENT IS PROPERLY TRAINED AND CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 C.F.R. SECTION 82.40. IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 609(C).

Defendants (1)

• FROST AUTO ALIGNMENTNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

• FROST AUTO ALIGNMENT

  286 TINY TOWN RD, CLARKSVILLE, TN, 37042

  Registry ID: 110010758634

• FROST AUTO ALIGNMENT

  286 TINY TOWN RD, CLARKSVILLE, TN, 37042

  Registry ID: 110010758634

Statutes cited

• CAA SUBCHP6 — Clean Air Act

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• FROST AUTO ALIGNMENTentered 1999-04-22

  Primary law: CAA

  Federal penalty: $1,000

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 1999-03-08Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1999-03-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1999-04-22Final Order Issued