EPA v. GENERAL SMELTING AND REFINING, INC.
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$30,000
Case summary
COMPLAINT FILED 7/22/98 PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $157,000 COMPLAINT ALLEGES: COUNT I RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE FACE VELOCITY REQUIREMENTS BY DECEMBER 23, 1997. IN VIOLATION OF THE CAA SECTION 112. COUNT II RESPONDNET FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE FACE VELOCITY REQUIREMENTS BY DECEMBER 23, 1997. IN VIOLATION OF CAA SECTION 112. COUNT III RESPONDENT FAILED TO SUBMIT ITS FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES MANUAL AND ITS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR BAGHOUSES TO THE TENNESSEE DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONVERSATION BY JULY 23, 1997. IN VIOLATION OF THE CAA SECTION 112.
Defendants (1)
- GENERAL SMELTING AND REFINING, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
METALICO COLLEGE GROVE INCORPORATED
8430 HORTON HIGHWAY, COLLEGE GROVE, TN, 37046
Registry ID: 110002040069
Statutes cited
- CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GENERAL SMELTING AND REFINING, INC.entered 1998-12-16
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $30,000
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1998-07-24Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1998-08-12Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1998-12-16Final Order Issued
- 1999-03-04Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 22718
- Case number
- 04-1998-0367
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- RCRA
- EPA region
- 04
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Hazardous Air Pollutants
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-1998-0367 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.