EPA v. TIMCO, INC. (Collection Referral)
Litigated With Penalty
Case summary
THIS IS A COLLECTION ACTION. EPA FILED AN ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AGAINST TIMCO ON SPETEMBER 30, 1996. IN DECEMBER 1996, EPA AND TIMCO ENTERED INTO A CACO TO RESOLVE THE VIOLATION IN THE COMPLAINT. THE VIOLATION WAS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ITS PERMIT BY NOT SUBMITTING A CONFIRMATORY SAMPLING WORKPLAN. THE PENALTY WAS FOR $41,000. $10,000 IN 11/96 AND $31,000 IN 11/97. IN JANUARY 1997, TIMCO PAID $10,000. THEY HAVE NOT PAID ANYTHING SINCE. THEY CLAIM INABILITY TO PAY. FINANCIAL INFORMATION INDICATES THEY CAN PAY.
Defendants (4)
- SPREITLER, DANNY JOE
- SPREITLER, DENISE DANS
- TAYLOR, J. METRO
- TIMCO, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
TIMCO INCORPORATED
941 SOUTH MAGNOLIA DR, WIGGINS, MS, 39577
Registry ID: 110000748549
Statutes cited
- RCRA 3005A — Res Conserv & Rec Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Timco, Inc. (Judgment)entered 2002-09-30
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $46,905
Timeline (7 milestones)
- 1997-09-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1998-03-31Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2001-12-05Complaint Filed With Court
- 2002-09-30Concluded
- 2002-09-30Final Order Entered
- 2002-09-30Final Order Lodged
- 2003-05-07Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 22497
- Case number
- 04-1998-0127
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- Branch
- RCRA
- EPA region
- 04
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Res Conserv & Rec Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-1998-0127 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.