EPA v. STOLLER CHEMICAL COMPANY

Case summary

SEE ALSO PREVIOUS MATTER NUMBERS 04-93-0295, 04-93-0296, AND 04-93-0297 (ARCHIVED). PRIOR TO FILING THE BANKRUPTCY PETITION, STOLLER CHEMICAL COMPANY OWNED AND OPERTED THREE SUPERFUND REMOVAL SITES IN REGION IV: JERICHO, SC; SEVERN, NC; AND LELAND, MS. THESE REMOVALS POTENTIALLY INCLUDE DISPOSING OF DRUMS OF MATERIALS THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE ASSETS OF THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE. EPA HAS DISCUSSED THIS WITH KAREN DWORKIN OF DOJ WHO CONCURRED THAT THE BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE SHOULD ABANDON THE ESTATE'S INTEREST IN THE DRUMS. THE PURPOSE OF THE REFERRAL IS TO PROVIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO DOJ TO FACILITATE THE APPROPRIATE ACTION, AND SECURE EPA'S INTEREST AS A CREDITOR.

Defendants (1)

• STOLLER CHEMICAL COMPANYNamed in complaint

Facilities (3)

• STROLELR CHEMICAL SEVERN

  HWY 35, SEVERN, NC, 27877

  Registry ID: 110010582093

• STOLLER CHEMICAL CO. - CHARLESTON

  U.S. HIGHWAY 17, CHARLESTON, SC, 29407

  Registry ID: 110009261912

• STROLLER CHEMICALS

  REXBURG RD, LELAND, MS, 38756

  Registry ID: 110010582084

Statutes cited

• CERCLA 107 — Superfund

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 1994-08-09Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1994-08-09Referred To Dept Of Justice
• 1994-08-10Complaint Filed With Court