EPA v. LUSK, GORDON, M. AND DANNY E. LUSK (LIN-ELECTRIC)
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Case summary
THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, WILL RESOLVE EPA'S CLAIM AGAINST THE LUSKS FOR PAST COSTS INCURRED AT THE SITE. UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, THE LUSKS HAVE AGREED TO PAY EPA $21,358.00. THE LUSKS HAVE OWNED THE SITE SINCE 2006. FROM 1924 TO 2000, THE SITE WAS USED TO REBUILD ELECTRIC MOTORS AND TRANSFORMERS USED IN THE COAL MINING INDUSTRY, AS WELL AS TO REPAIR AND MANUFACTURE COILS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORS. THE MOTORS, TRANSFORMERS, AND COILS WERE CLEANED WITH TRICHLOROETHYLENE ( TCE ), AND POLY-CHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ( PCBs ) WERE PRESENT IN THE WASTE AS A RESULT OF THE CLEANING OPERATIONS, DUE TO THE FACT THAT SOME OF THE EQUIPMENT CONTAINED PCB OIL.
Defendants (2)
- LUSK, GORDON, M.Named in settlement
- LUSK, DANNY E.Named in settlement
Facilities (2)
LIN ELECTRIC COMPANY
1400 BLUEFIELD AVENUE, BLUEFIELD, WV, 24701
Registry ID: 110020583420
LIN ELECTRIC COMPANY
1400 BLUEFIELD AVENUE, BLUEFIELD, WV, 24701-2614
Registry ID: 110020583420
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Enforcement conclusions (1)
LUSK, GORDON, M. AND DANNY E. LUSK (LIN-ELECTRIC)entered 2015-09-29
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2015-09-29Final Order Issued
- 2015-10-05Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3600398394
- Case number
- 03-2016-0182
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 03
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 03-2016-0182 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.