EPA v. SUNBURY, CITY OF, PA

Case summary

EPA ALLEGES THAT THE RESPONDENT DID NOT CONDUCT A REVIEW OF THE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REGULATED SUBSTANCE, PROCESS, AND PROCEDURES. IN ADDITION, THE FACILITY DID NOT CERTIFY THAT COMPLIANCE AUDITS ARE CONDUCTED AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES ARE ADEQUATE AND ARE BEING FOLLOWED AT THE FACILITY AT 1600 EAST MARKET STREET, SUNBURY, PA.

Defendants (1)

• MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SUNBURY, PANamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• CITY OF SUNBURY WATER FILTRATION PLANT

  1600 EAST STREET, SUNBURY, PA, 17801

  Registry ID: 110054914018

Statutes cited

• CAA 112[R][7] — Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• SUNBURY, CITY OF, PAentered 2014-06-30

  Primary law: CAA

  Federal penalty: $840

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2014-06-30Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2014-06-30Final Order Issued
• 2014-07-01Enforcement Action Data Entered