EPA v. PETERSHIEM, MELVIN AND MOSES
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
THE RESPONDENTS OPERATED A DAIRY AND EGG-LAYING OPERATIONS AT THE FACILITY, WHICH WAS OWNED BY MELVIN PETERSHEIM. CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION OF THE FACILITY ON APRIL 1, 2010, AND OBSERVED THE DISCHARG EO FPOLLUTANTS (MANURE AND MILK-HOUSE WASTES) FROM THE FACILITY INTO WATERS OF HTE UNITED STATES. EPA DETERMINED, BASED ON OBSERVATIONS MADE AT THE FACILITY AS WELL AS STATEMENTS MADE BY THE RESPONDENTS, THE FACILITY QUALIFIED AS A LARGE CAFO. EPA ALSO DETERMINED THAT THE RESPONDENTS LACKED AN NPDES PERMIT. AS A RESULT, EPA DETERMINED THAT THE RESPONDENTS VIOLATED THE CWA PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS INTO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT A NPDES PERMIT.
Defendants (1)
- MELVIN AND MOSES PETERSHEIM (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
MELVIN AND MOSES PETERSHEIM
320 WEST HERNLEY RD, MANHEIM, PA, 17545
Registry ID: 110041874754
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PETERSHIEM, MELVIN AND MOSESentered 2011-09-12
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $2,500
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2010-09-13Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2010-09-22Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2011-09-12Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 2200010548
- Case number
- 03-2010-0371
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 03
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 03-2010-0371 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.