EPA v. ST MICHAELS
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
THE PWS FILED A 40/30 CERTIFICATION WITH EPA. THE TTHM AND HAA5 DATA SUBMITTED WAS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HIGHEST POTENTIAL FOR DISINFECTION BY PRODUCT FORMATION. EPA REQUESTED TAT THE SYSTEM COLLECT MORE TTHM/HAA5 DATA IN THE SUMMER OF 2009 TO SUPORT IS 40/30 CERTIFICATION. THE SYSTEM FAILED TO SUBMIT THE REQUESTED DATA, SO EPA IS REQUIRED STANDAR MONITORING. THE SYSTEM WAS INSTRUCTED TO SUBMIT A STANDARD MONITORING PLAN, BUT HAS FAILED TO DO SO.
Defendants (1)
- RICHADARSON, JEFFNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ST MICHAELS
109 GLOR AVE, ST MICHAELS, MD, 21663
Registry ID: 110041200875
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1412 — Nat'l Drinking Water Compliance Schedule - Effective Date
Enforcement conclusions (1)
ST MICHAELSentered 2010-03-04
Primary law: SDWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2010-03-04Final Order Issued
- 2010-03-11Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2011-07-25Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 1800081451
- Case number
- 03-2010-0102
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 03
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Nat'l Drinking Water Compliance Schedule - Effective Date
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 03-2010-0102 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.