EPA v. New Hope-Solebury School District
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
EPA INSPECTORS OBSERVED UNTRAINED AND UNACCREDITED SUPERVISORS AND WORKERS REVIEWING ASBESTOS-CONTAMINATED BOILER FROM NEW HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITY. NOTICE OF INTENT TO RENOVATE WAS NOT PROVIDED, AS REQUIRED. PROPER SAFETY MEASURES WERE NOT UNDERTAKEN BY WORKERS (E.G. FAILURE TO WET). SCHOOL DISTRICT ALSO FAILED TO HAVE MANAGEMENT PLAN AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW. ALL PENALTIES CAN BE FOUND UNDER THE CAA STATUTE (51,500 (CAA) AND 22,000(TSCA).
Defendants (3)
- JOHNSON, AL CO INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- WORTH & COMPANY, INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- New Hope-Solebury School DistrictNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
NEW HOPE SOLEBURY ELEM SCH
180 W BRIDGE ST, NEW HOPE, PA, 189381424
Registry ID: 110000954717
Statutes cited
- TSCA 207A2 — False Info on Asbestos Inspection
- CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants
Enforcement conclusions (2)
Al Johnson Co and Worth & Co Incentered 2003-05-16
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $25,000
New Hope-Solebury School Districtentered 2002-12-12
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $17,000
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2002-02-06Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2002-03-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2003-05-16Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 19871
- Case number
- 03-2002-0088
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- 3RC10
- EPA region
- 03
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- False Info on Asbestos Inspection
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 03-2002-0088 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.