Skip to main content
03-2002-0088Administrative - FormalFinal Order IssuedFY 2002· Region 03

EPA v. New Hope-Solebury School District

Final Order With Penalty

Case summary

EPA INSPECTORS OBSERVED UNTRAINED AND UNACCREDITED SUPERVISORS AND WORKERS REVIEWING ASBESTOS-CONTAMINATED BOILER FROM NEW HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITY. NOTICE OF INTENT TO RENOVATE WAS NOT PROVIDED, AS REQUIRED. PROPER SAFETY MEASURES WERE NOT UNDERTAKEN BY WORKERS (E.G. FAILURE TO WET). SCHOOL DISTRICT ALSO FAILED TO HAVE MANAGEMENT PLAN AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW. ALL PENALTIES CAN BE FOUND UNDER THE CAA STATUTE (51,500 (CAA) AND 22,000(TSCA).

Defendants (3)

  • JOHNSON, AL CO INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
  • WORTH & COMPANY, INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
  • New Hope-Solebury School DistrictNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • NEW HOPE SOLEBURY ELEM SCH

    180 W BRIDGE ST, NEW HOPE, PA, 189381424

    Registry ID: 110000954717

Statutes cited

  • TSCA 207A2False Info on Asbestos Inspection
  • CAA 112Hazardous Air Pollutants

Enforcement conclusions (2)

  • Al Johnson Co and Worth & Co Incentered 2003-05-16

    Primary law: CAA

    Federal penalty: $25,000

  • New Hope-Solebury School Districtentered 2002-12-12

    Primary law: CAA

    Federal penalty: $17,000

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2002-02-06Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2002-03-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2003-05-16Final Order Issued

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
19871
Case number
03-2002-0088
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
AIR
Branch
3RC10
EPA region
03
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
False Info on Asbestos Inspection

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 03-2002-0088 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.