EPA v. SUNBEAM CORPORATION, IN RE

Case summary

THIS IS A BANKRTUPTCY REFERRAL WITH TWO POTENTIAL CLAIMS. ONE CLAIM IS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN EXISTING CONSENT DECREE WHICH REQUIRES SUNBEAM TO IMPLEMENT AN RD/RA AT THE BALLY SITE. THE OTHER CLAIM IS FOR A SUSPECTED FRADULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS FROM TEMRAC, COMPANY, INC. TO SUNBEAM, RELATED TO TEMRAC'S LIABILITY AT THE CROSSLEY FARM SITE. THE ASSET THAT WAS ALLEGEDLY TRANSFERRED WAS THE CASH FROM THE SALE OF THE BALLY SITE PROPERTY, WHICH TEMRAC OWNED.

Defendants (1)

• SUNBEAM CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

• CROSSLEY FARMS

  1271 HOFFS CHURCH RD, BARTO, PA, 19504

  Registry ID: 110010718349

• BALLY GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION

  ROUTE 100 20 N THIRD STREET, BALLY, PA, 19503

  Registry ID: 110006186581

Statutes cited

• CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• SUNBEAM CORPORATION, IN REentered 2006-02-26

  Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 2001-05-30Referred To Dept Of Justice
• 2001-06-07Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2001-08-01Complaint Filed With Court
• 2006-02-26Final Order Entered
• 2006-02-26Final Order Lodged