EPA v. GARDEN STATE TANNING INC
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$54,900
Case summary
CLASS II GST DISCHARGED EFFLUENT INTO WATER WHICH GST WAS NOT AUTHORIZED TO DISCHARGE. GST FAILED TO MAINTAIN ITS EFFLUENT TREATMENT FACILITIES AS REQUIRED BY ITS PERMIT AND GST DISCHARGED NEW AND DIFFERENT POLLUTANTS WITHOUT APPLYING FOR A NEW PERMIT.
Defendants (1)
- GARDEN STATE TANNING INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (4)
GARDEN STATE TANNING INCORPORATED W D BYRON PLANT
15717 CLEAR SPRING RD., WILLIAMSPORT, MD, 21795
Registry ID: 110000340569
GARDEN STATE TANNING INCORPORATED W D BYRON PLANT
15717 CLEAR SPRING RD., WILLIAMSPORT, MD, 21795
Registry ID: 110000340569
GARDEN STATE TANNING INCORPORATED W D BYRON PLANT
15717 CLEAR SPRING RD., WILLIAMSPORT, MD, 21795
Registry ID: 110000340569
GARDEN STATE TANNING INCORPORATED W D BYRON PLANT
15717 CLEAR SPRING RD., WILLIAMSPORT, MD, 21795
Registry ID: 110000340569
Statutes cited
- CWA 402 — Clean Water Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GARDEN STATE TANNING, INC.entered 1999-03-30
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $54,900
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1998-07-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1998-08-05Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1999-03-30Final Order Issued
- 1999-05-03Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 18194
- Case number
- 03-1998-0285
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- 3RC20
- EPA region
- 03
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Clean Water Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 03-1998-0285 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.