EPA v. MALITOVSKY DRUM COMPANY

Case summary

THIS CASE IS A CERCLA SECTION 107(A) COST RECOVERY SEEK- ING TO RECOVER APPROXIMATELY $1 MILLION FOR EPA'S EXPENSES INCURRED IN PERFORMING A REMOVAL ACTION AT THIS ABANDON DRUM RECYCLING FACILITY IN 1984.

Defendants (13)

• USX CORP.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
• RANBAR TECHNOLOGYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• AMERICAN CHEMICAL CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• ARISTECHNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• ARMCO STEELNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• BALL CHEMICAL CO.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
• CONOCO, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
• ESTATE OF SIDNEY MALLETNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• MALITOVSKY COOPERAGE CO.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
• MALITOVSKY DRUM CO.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
• MALLET, CHARLOTTENamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• MALLET, JEFFREYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• MALITOVSKY DRUM COMPANY

  3600 SMALLMAN ST, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15201

  Registry ID: 110009308196

Statutes cited

• CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• MALITOVSKY COOPERAGEentered 1995-02-21

  Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (6 milestones)

• 1989-08-25Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1989-08-25Referred To Dept Of Justice
• 1989-10-12Complaint Filed With Court
• 1995-02-21Final Order Lodged
• 1995-02-21Final Order Entered
• 1995-02-21Concluded