EPA v. Quality Plus Contracting
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
EPA received a tip/complaint alleging a contracting firm had violated requirements of the Renovation, Repair & Painting (RRP) Rule while working at a pre-1978 property in Cape May, NJ The contracting firm has a business address in Erma, NJ and performed a regulated renovation without prior EPA RRP-firm certification, and without proper worker training. EPA is requiring the firm to come into compliance, and is seeking a monetary penalty by offer of an Expedited Settlement Agreement.
Defendants (1)
- Quality Plus ContractingNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
QUALITY PLUS CONTRACTING
620 SHUNPIKE ROAD, ERMA, NJ, 08204
Registry ID: 110069435285
Statutes cited
- TSCA 402C — Lead: RRP
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Quality Plus Contractingentered 2017-06-27
Primary law: TSCA
Federal penalty: $2,000
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2017-06-27Enforcement Action Closed
- 2017-06-27Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2017-06-27Final Order Issued
- 2017-06-30Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3601086631
- Case number
- 02-2017-9173
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Lead: RRP
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2017-9173 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.