EPA v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
Final Order With Unspecified Cost Recovery
Case summary
The agreement provides for the Respondent to perform the Operable Unit 2 response action selected in EPA's September 26, 2016 Decision Document for soil, sediment, and surface water at the Site, at an estimated value of $14,460,649 million. The work includes, but is not limited to, excavation of contaminated soil and contaminated sediment; engineering controls including asphalt caps in parking lots and vegetated soil covers; restoration and revegetation; institutional controls; and surface water monitoring. The contaminants of concern include lead, arsenic and other heavy metals. In addition to performing the response action, the Respondent will reimburse the United States for future response costs incurred by EPA in overseeing the Respondent's performance of the work.
Defendants (1)
- The Sherwin-Williams CompanyNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ROUTE 561 DUMP
ROUTE 561, GIBBSBORO, NJ, 08026
Registry ID: 110009341293
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
- CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Enforcement conclusions (1)
The Sherwin-Williams Companyentered 2017-03-28
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2017-03-28Final Order Issued
- 2017-03-28Enforcement Action Closed
- 2017-03-30Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3600991989
- Case number
- 02-2017-2020
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2017-2020 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.