EPA v. Fairview Citgo (SB) et al.
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Facility maintained release detection through groundwater well monitoring system that it could not demonstrate met the requirements of 280.43. Site eventually placed into temp closure pending new wells or an alternative RD method.
Defendants (2)
- Edward ConchiglioNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- Fairview Citgo (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
FAIRVIEW CITGO
607 SAW MILL RIVER RD, ELMSFORD, NY, 10523
Registry ID: 110055111579
Statutes cited
- RCRA 9003 — UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Fairview Citgo (SB) et al.entered 2015-05-12
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $420
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2015-05-12Enforcement Action Closed
- 2015-05-12Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2015-05-12Final Order Issued
- 2015-05-14Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3600134126
- Case number
- 02-2015-7906
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2015-7906 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.