EPA v. Hernandez L. Painting (SB)

Case summary

Respondent failed to obtain firm certification, failed to ensure that a renovator was assigned to the renovation and distribute a lead-hazard information pamphlet as required by the Renovation, Repair & Painting (RRP) Rule. Respondent's failures to comply with the RRP Rule will be addressed as follows: 1) Respondent has obtained firm certification 2) Respondent will take required individual training to comply with renovator requirements and 3) Respondent will distribute the lead-hazard information pamphlet as required by the RRP Rule for future renovations. Respondent's penalty was reduced as per appropriate LBP guidance given its status as a micro-business.

Defendants (1)

• Hernandez L. Painting (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• HERNANDEZ L. PAINTING

  44 HARVARD STREET, HEMPSTEAD, NY, 11550

  Registry ID: 110055644735

Statutes cited

• TSCA 402 — Lead-Based Paint Activities, Training and/or Certification
• TSCA 406B — Lead: Pre-Renovation Education Rule

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• Hernandez L. Painting (SB)entered 2013-08-01

  Primary law: TSCA

  Federal penalty: $1,560

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2013-08-01Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2013-08-01Enforcement Action Closed
• 2013-08-01Final Order Issued
• 2013-08-08Enforcement Action Data Entered