EPA v. PZ Painting (SB)
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Respondent failed to obtain firm certification and distribute a lead hazard information pamphlet as required by the Renovation, Repair, and Painting (RRP) Rule. The settlement requires the Respondent to obtain firm certification and distribute the information pamphlet to their clients, as required under the RRP Rule, and payment of a civil penalty. The final penalty was reduced due to their documented status as a micro business.
Defendants (1)
- PZ Painting (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
18 CHURCHMALL RENOVATION
18 CHURCH MALL ROAD, SPRINGFIELD, NJ, 07081
Registry ID: 110046290367
Statutes cited
- TSCA 402 — Lead-Based Paint Activities, Training and/or Certification
- TSCA 406B — Lead: Pre-Renovation Education Rule
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PZ Painting (SB)entered 2013-02-26
Primary law: TSCA
Federal penalty: $980
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2012-09-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2012-10-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2013-02-26Final Order Issued
- 2013-02-26Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3000066194
- Case number
- 02-2012-9170
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- WTS
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Lead-Based Paint Activities, Training and/or Certification
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2012-9170 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.