EPA v. Emerald Beach Resort II
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
Respondent violated 40 CFR Part 141, Subpart L (Stage 1 DBPR) by exceeding the MCL for TTHM. The AO requires Respondent to increase TTHM/HAA5 monitoring frequency to quarterly. Injunctive relief includes the cost of monitoring, reporting and public notification.
Defendants (1)
- Emerald Beach Resort IINamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
EMERALD BEACH RESORT II
8070 LINDBERGH BAY, ST. THOMAS, VI, 00802
Registry ID: 110022314734
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1412/1414 — National Drinking Water Regulations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Emerald Beach Resort IIentered 2012-05-04
Primary law: SDWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2012-05-04Final Order Issued
- 2012-05-04Enforcement Action Closed
- 2012-05-08Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3000018597
- Case number
- 02-2012-8083
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- WGL
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- National Drinking Water Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2012-8083 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.