EPA v. Tanama WTP
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
1) Tanamá WTP has two discharge points. The washwater coming from the filter and settling tanks are discharged through different discharge points. 2) PRASA must start monitoring outfall 002 at the Tanamá WTP for all the parameters under the same terms and conditions required by the permit for outfall 001. The monitoring for outfall 002 shall continue until such time the permit is renewed to include outfall 002 as a discharge point or until the discharge from outfall 002 is eliminated.
Defendants (1)
- Tanama WTPNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PRASA WTP TANAMA
ROAD 131, KM 7 HM 1, ADJUNTAS, PR, 00601
Registry ID: 110013689053
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Tanama WTPentered 2006-10-23
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2006-10-23Final Order Issued
- 2006-11-21NPDES Closed
- 2007-01-09Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 600024131
- Case number
- 02-2007-3006
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- CT
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2007-3006 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.