EPA v. GE Ionics
Source Agrees
Case summary
THIS DISCLOSURE WAS INITIALLY DENIED DUE TO A PREVIOUS INSPECTION. UPON OBTAINING FURTHER INFORMATION, THE DISCLOSURE WAS FOUND ELIGIBLE FOR THE AUDIT POLICY. GE IONICS QUALIFIES FOR 100% MITIGATION OF GRAVITY BASED PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION DISCLOSED. ECONOMIC BENEFIT WAS INSIGNIFICANT.
Defendants (1)
- GE IonicsNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
GE IONICS
PALOMINO ISLAND, FAJARDO, PR, 00738
Registry ID: 110028183757
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GE Ionicsentered 2006-12-05
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2006-12-05Enforcement Action Closed
- 2006-12-05Final Order Issued
- 2008-02-06Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 600081025
- Case number
- 02-2006-0886
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- WGL
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2006-0886 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.