EPA v. Rutgers Cook/Douglass/Newark/MasonGross/Camden
Source Agrees
Case summary
RUTGERS QUALIFIED FOR 100% MITIGATION OF THE VIOLATIONS DISCLOSED THAT QUALIFIED FOR EPA'S AUDIT POLICY. ECONOMIC BENEFIT WAS INSIGNIFICANT.
Defendants (1)
- Rutgers Cook/Douglass/Newark/MasonGross/Camden
Facilities (4)
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY-CAMDEN CAMPUS
COOPER ST, CAMDEN, NJ, 08102
Registry ID: 110007948579
NJ RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
33 LIVINGSTON AVE, NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ, 08901
Registry ID: 110004268015
NJ RUTGERS UNIV
360 DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR BOULEVARD, NEWARK, NJ, 07102
Registry ID: 110000803195
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - COOK/DOUGLAS CAMPUS
COOK/DOUGLAS CAMPUS, NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ, 08903
Registry ID: 110007948418
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1421 — UIC Regulations
- CWA 311J — SPCC and/or Federal Response Plan Violations
- RCRA 3002 — Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Rutgers Cook/Douglass/Newark/MasonGross/Camdenentered 2006-08-28
Primary law: RCRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2006-08-28Final Order Issued
- 2006-08-28Enforcement Action Closed
- 2006-09-05Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 600002622
- Case number
- 02-2006-0864
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- WTS
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- UIC Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2006-0864 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.