EPA v. Raritan Brunswick, L.P.
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
Management company for Gardens at Raritan (520 unit apartment complex) was not doing lead-based paint disclosure. Ten leases were reviewed, of which 3 had children under 6. Violations occurred after 3/15/04, so penalties were increased for inflation. Management company has agreed to perfom a SEP with the replacement of approximately 221 windows with vinyl windows, to reduce the possibilty of lead poisoning from lead-based paint with an added benefit of reducing fuel usage. The CA/CO was issued under the name: Renaissance Management Group. During negotiations the name was changed to Raritan Brunswick, L.P. SB . The final order was issued under the new name and the case name is changed to: Raritan Brunswick, L.P.
Defendants (2)
- Renaissance Management Group (SB)Named in complaint
- Raritan Brunswick, L.P. (SB)Named in settlement
Facilities (1)
RENAISSANCE MGT GROUP-GARDENS AT RARITAN, THE
1 CHESTER CIRCLE, NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ, 08901
Registry ID: 110022318874
Statutes cited
- TSCA 409 — Lead: Violation of Section 1018
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Raritan Brunswick, L.P.entered 2006-03-24
Primary law: TSCA
Federal penalty: $5,930 · SEP: $53,438
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2005-06-24Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2005-06-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2006-03-24Enforcement Action Closed
- 2006-03-24Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 150366
- Case number
- 02-2005-9170
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- WTS
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Lead: Violation of Section 1018
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2005-9170 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.