EPA v. Keystone Industries

Case summary

Seeking to remedy the following violations at the facility: (1) Failure to promptly secure a closure/control device on three hazardous waste tanks; (2) Failure to identify equipment regulated under 40 CFR Part 265 Subpart BB; (3) Failure to monitor equipment pursuant to 40 CFR Part 265 Subpart BB. Relief requested is compliance with the requirements. CCDS: EPA cited the facility for: (1) Failure to promptly secure a closure/control device on three hazardous waste tanks; (2) Failure ot identify equipment regulated under 40 CFR Part 265 Subpart BB; (3)Failure to monitor equipment pursuant to 40 CFR Part 265 Subpart BB. Pursuant to the settlement terms in this Compliance Agreement the facility has agreed to:(1)install and maintain closure devised (conservation vents) on its hazardous waste stroage tanks; (2) monitor the regulated valves on its hazardous waste storage tanks pursuant to 40 CFR 265.

Defendants (1)

• Keystone IndustriesNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• KEYSTONE INDUSTRIES

  616 HOLLYWOOD AVENUE, CHERRY HILL, NJ, 08002-2821

  Registry ID: 110000498319

Statutes cited

• RCRA 3002 — Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• Keystone Industriesentered 2005-07-29

  Primary law: RCRA

  Federal penalty: $14,000

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2004-12-27Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2004-12-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2005-07-29Enforcement Action Closed
• 2005-07-29Final Order Issued