EPA v. Fairview Gardens LLC

Case summary

This inspection started with a denial of entry. EPA sent an information request letter, received an unsatisfactory response, and referred it to ORC. After ORC contacted the Respondent, they provided leases for review. There was no disclosure done prior to our inspection, or even up to 11 months after our inspection, as evidenced by the leases sent to EPA. One disclosure was done, on a new lease, to show EPA that they are now doing it, but it was done incorrectly. CCDS: This inspection started with a denial of entry. EPA sent an information request letter, received an unsatisfactory response, and referred it to ORC. After ORC contacted the Respondent, they provided leases for review. There was no disclosure done prior to our inspection, or even up to 11 months after our inspection, as evidenced by the leases sent to EPA. One disclosure was done, on a new lease, to show EPA that they are now doing it, but it was done incorrectly. Final settlement is adjusted to reflect window replacement done by owner.

Defendants (1)

• Fairview Gardens LLCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• FAIRVIEW GARDENS

  90 FAIRVIEW AVENUE, KINGSTON, NY, 12401

  Registry ID: 110015757616

Statutes cited

• TSCA 409 — Lead: Violation of Section 1018

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• Fairview Gardens LLCentered 2004-04-27

  Primary law: TSCA

  Federal penalty: $15,000

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2003-12-12Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2003-12-22Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2004-04-27Enforcement Action Closed
• 2004-04-27Final Order Issued