EPA v. Super Value New York, Inc.

Case summary

Respondent failed to comply with upgrade requirements by the required date, December 22, 1998. In addition, respondent failed to comply with release detection requirements. Under this order he is required to certify compliance at all his facilities. Under this CAFO, he's also required to conduct training for his employees that handled the UST systems at all his facilities. He's a multi-facility owner and has facilities in different states. This CAFO was negotiated and finalized without the issuance of a complaint.

Defendants (2)

• Datillo, MichaelNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• Super Value New York, IncNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (12)

• AMOCO SERVICE STATION

  168 N MAIN STREET, SPRING VALLEY, NY, 10977

  Registry ID: 110018937640

• TEXACO

  68 ROUTE 59, SPRING VALLEY, NY, 10977

  Registry ID: 110018938765

• SUPER VALUE CITGO

  357 TUCKAHOE ROAD, YONKERS, NY, 10707

  Registry ID: 110001587541

• SUPER VALUE CITGO

  1481 ROUTE 22, BREWSTER, NY, 17041

  Registry ID: 110018940191

• SUPER VALUE CITGO

  249 DOLSON AVENUE, MIDDLETOWN, NY, 10980

  Registry ID: 110018940182

• TEXACO SERVICE STATION

  83 ROUTE 59 EAST, MONSEY, NY, 10952

  Registry ID: 110006093388

• SUPER VALUE CITGO

  70 BROOKSIDE AVENUE, CHESTER, NY, 10918

  Registry ID: 110018939817

• SUPER VALUE, INC.

  255 SOUTH MAIN STREET, NEW CITY, NY, 10993

  Registry ID: 110018940119

• CITGO

  ROUTE 9W & MAIN STREET, STONY POINT, NY, 10952

  Registry ID: 110018940173

• AMOCO

  ROUTE 9W & RAILROAD AVENUE, WEST HAVERSTRAW, NY, 10918

  Registry ID: 110018937560

• SUPER VALUE

  75 WEST ROUTE 59, MONSEY, NY, 10956

  Registry ID: 110018940128

• AMOCO

  101 SOUTH MAIN STREET, NEW CITY, NY, 10956

  Registry ID: 110018939808

Statutes cited

• RCRA 9003 — UST Release Detection, Prevention, Correction Regulations

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• Super Value New York, Inc.entered 2004-09-15

  Primary law: RCRA

  Federal penalty: $132,500

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 2004-09-15Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2004-09-15Final Order Issued
• 2004-09-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2006-02-16Demand for Stipulated Penalties
• 2006-03-09Enforcement Action Closed