EPA v. ADM Milling Company

Case summary

This is a consolidated action pursuant to our Consolidated Rules of Practice, 40 C.F.R. �22.18(b)(2) and (3), which provide that a proceeding may be simultaneously commenced and concluded by the issuance of a Consent Agreement and Final Order when the parties agree to settle one or more causes of action before the filing of an Administrative Complaint. A review of the Toxic Release Inventory Envirofacts Database (TRI Database) indicated that AD Midland Milling Company voluntarily submitted to the EPA a late Form R report for the following: Chemical Name ReportingYear Report Due Report Submitted Days Late bromomethane 2001 July 1, 2002 June 24, 2003 358 On December 23, 2003, a letter was sent to the company to address this late reporting violation and to request additional information. Based on the information provided by ADM Milling Company�s initial response and subsequent communications the late reporting was confirmed. This failure to submit the Form R report, in a timely manner, constitutes a violation of Section 313 of EPCRA, 42 U.S.C. �11023, and 40 C.F.R �372.30. The penalty was initially calculated using the Enforcement Response Policy (ERP) for Section 313 of EPCRA issued by the USEPA Office of Compliance Monitoring, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, on August 10, 1992. The original proposed penalty would have been $10,904 if an administrative complaint had been issued.

Defendants (1)

• ADM Milling CompanyNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• ADM MILLING COMPANY

  250 GANSON ST, BUFFALO, NY, 14203

  Registry ID: 110009464971

Statutes cited

• EPCRA 313 — Toxic Chemical Release Reporting (TRI)

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• ADM Milling Companyentered 2004-03-11

  Primary law: EPCRA

  Federal penalty: $2,726

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2004-03-11Enforcement Action Closed
• 2004-03-11Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2004-03-11Final Order Issued
• 2004-03-15Enforcement Action Data Entered