EPA v. PRASA Camuy-Hatillo
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
EPA finds that the Camuy-Hatillo is unable to meet the wate quality based effluent limits set out in its NPDES permit and that PRASA is not maintaining and operating the facility adquately. This Administrative Order (AO) requires PRASA to maximize the operation and maintenance of the Camuy-Hatillo WWTP in order to achieve and maintain compliance with all the final effluent limitations. In addition, this AO requires PRASA to submit a plan that outlines a scheudle, for the completion of all permanent repairs/tasks needed to correct the deficiencies found during a compliance evaluation inspection conducted on February 11, 2004.
Defendants (1)
- PRASA Camuy-HatilloNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PRASA CAMUY-HATILLO WWTP
STATE ROAD 485, CAMUY, PR, 00627
Registry ID: 110007820117
Statutes cited
- CWA 309 — Violation of Existing AO
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PRASA Camuy-Hatilloentered 2004-03-26
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2004-03-26Enforcement Action Closed
- 2004-03-26Final Order Issued
- 2004-03-26NPDES Closed
- 2004-04-02Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 115130
- Case number
- 02-2004-3063
- Lead agency
- EPA
- Branch
- CT
- EPA region
- 02
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Violation of Existing AO
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2004-3063 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.