Skip to main content
02-2003-3008Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2003· Region 02

EPA v. PRASA Cayey WWTP

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Case summary

EPA finds that the Cayey Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is unable to meet the water quality based effluent limits set out in its NPDES permit and that PRASA is not maintaning and operating the facility adequately. This Administrative Order (AO) requires PRASA to maximize the operation and maintenace of the Cayey WWTP in order to achieve and maintain compliance with all the final effluent limitations. In addition, this AO requires PRASA to submit a compliance plan that outlines a schedule, for the completion of all permanent repairs/tasks needed to correct the deficiencies found during a compliance evaluation inspection conducted on June 6, 2002.

Defendants (1)

  • PRASA Cayey WWTPNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • PRASA CAYEY WWTP

    STATE ROAD NUMBER 171, KM. 5.8, CIDRA, PR, 00739

    Registry ID: 110014408550

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • PRASA Cayey WWTPentered 2002-11-20

    Primary law: CWA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2002-11-20Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2002-11-20Final Order Issued
  • 2003-04-11Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
94417
Case number
02-2003-3008
Lead agency
EPA
Branch
CT
EPA region
02
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2003-3008 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.