EPA v. GARANOD CO., INC.
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
THIS MATTER CONSISTS OF A NON-NPL REMOVAL SITE, AT WHICH NUMEROUS VATS & DRUMS OF ANODIZING WASTES WERE ABANDONED BY THE FORMER OPERATOR WHEN IT CEASED FUNCTIONING SEVERAL YEARS AGO. IMPROPERLY STORED ACIDIC & CAUSTIC MATERIALS ARE FOUND THROUGHOUT THE SITE, PRESENTING CONDITIONS THAT CONSTITUTE AN IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR THE ENVIRONMENT. A UNILATERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE SITE OWNER, REQUIRING IT TO PERFORM RESPONSE ACTIONS INCLUDING SECURING THE ABANDONED MATERIALS AT THE SITE, SAMPLING AND ANALYZING THE MATERIALS, PROPERLY DISPOSING OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OFF-SITE AND DECONTAMINATING THE SITE.
Defendants (1)
- GARANOD COMPANY INCNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
EXACT ANODIZING CORPORATION
74-82 LIVINGSTON STREET, ELIZABETH, NJ, 07201
Registry ID: 110004249073
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GARANOD CO., INCentered 2001-10-19
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2001-10-19Final Order Issued
- 2001-10-19Enforcement Action Closed
- 2001-11-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 8768
- Case number
- 02-2002-2004
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- NJSUP
- EPA region
- 02
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2002-2004 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.