Skip to main content
02-2002-2004Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2002· Region 02

EPA v. GARANOD CO., INC.

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Case summary

THIS MATTER CONSISTS OF A NON-NPL REMOVAL SITE, AT WHICH NUMEROUS VATS & DRUMS OF ANODIZING WASTES WERE ABANDONED BY THE FORMER OPERATOR WHEN IT CEASED FUNCTIONING SEVERAL YEARS AGO. IMPROPERLY STORED ACIDIC & CAUSTIC MATERIALS ARE FOUND THROUGHOUT THE SITE, PRESENTING CONDITIONS THAT CONSTITUTE AN IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR THE ENVIRONMENT. A UNILATERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE SITE OWNER, REQUIRING IT TO PERFORM RESPONSE ACTIONS INCLUDING SECURING THE ABANDONED MATERIALS AT THE SITE, SAMPLING AND ANALYZING THE MATERIALS, PROPERLY DISPOSING OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OFF-SITE AND DECONTAMINATING THE SITE.

Defendants (1)

  • GARANOD COMPANY INCNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • EXACT ANODIZING CORPORATION

    74-82 LIVINGSTON STREET, ELIZABETH, NJ, 07201

    Registry ID: 110004249073

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 106AImminent & Substantial Endangerment Order

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • GARANOD CO., INCentered 2001-10-19

    Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2001-10-19Final Order Issued
  • 2001-10-19Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2001-11-28Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
8768
Case number
02-2002-2004
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
NJSUP
EPA region
02
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2002-2004 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.