Skip to main content
02-2001-3417Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2001· Region 02

EPA v. PRASA BOQUERON WWTP

Final Order With Penalty

Penalty assessed

$53,000

Case summary

***** RESPONDENTS HAVE VIOLATED THE CWA BY A) FAILURE TO PROVIDE O&M; B) EXCEEDING EFFLUENT LIMITS; C) DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS TO A LOCATION OTHER THAN THE ON SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND D) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED SECTION 309 AO. THE COMPLAINT PROPOSES CLASS II PENALTIES. ALTHOUGH THE PRASA IS THE PERMITTEE, WE ARE INCLUDING THE CAPR AS THE OPERATOR. ****** THE COMPLAINT ALLEGED VILATIONS AT THE BOQUERON WWTP FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE O&M; EXCEEDING EFFLUENTS LIMITS; DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS TO A LOCATION OTHER THAN THE ONE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ORDER. THE COMPLAINT PROPOSED A PENALTY OF $58,500 AND THE CASE WAS SETTLED FOR $53,000.00.

Defendants (1)

  • PRASA BOQUERON WWTPNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • PRASA BOQUERON

    BOQUERON COMMUNITY, CABO ROJO, PR, 00623

    Registry ID: 110009814843

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • PRASA BOQUERON WWTPentered 2002-04-22

    Primary law: CWA

    Federal penalty: $53,000

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 2001-09-25Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2001-10-04Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2002-04-22Final Order Issued
  • 2002-04-22Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
8431
Case number
02-2001-3417
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
WAT
Branch
CT
EPA region
02
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2001-3417 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.