EPA v. PRASA BOQUERON WWTP
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$53,000
Case summary
***** RESPONDENTS HAVE VIOLATED THE CWA BY A) FAILURE TO PROVIDE O&M; B) EXCEEDING EFFLUENT LIMITS; C) DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS TO A LOCATION OTHER THAN THE ON SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND D) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED SECTION 309 AO. THE COMPLAINT PROPOSES CLASS II PENALTIES. ALTHOUGH THE PRASA IS THE PERMITTEE, WE ARE INCLUDING THE CAPR AS THE OPERATOR. ****** THE COMPLAINT ALLEGED VILATIONS AT THE BOQUERON WWTP FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE O&M; EXCEEDING EFFLUENTS LIMITS; DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS TO A LOCATION OTHER THAN THE ONE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ORDER. THE COMPLAINT PROPOSED A PENALTY OF $58,500 AND THE CASE WAS SETTLED FOR $53,000.00.
Defendants (1)
- PRASA BOQUERON WWTPNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PRASA BOQUERON
BOQUERON COMMUNITY, CABO ROJO, PR, 00623
Registry ID: 110009814843
Statutes cited
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PRASA BOQUERON WWTPentered 2002-04-22
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $53,000
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2001-09-25Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2001-10-04Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2002-04-22Final Order Issued
- 2002-04-22Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 8431
- Case number
- 02-2001-3417
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- CT
- EPA region
- 02
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2001-3417 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.