EPA v. BRAY TERMINALS INC ET AL

Case summary

ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT IN THE FORM OF AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 122(H) OF CERCLA FOR RECOVERY OF PAST RESPONSE COSTS INCURRED BY EPA IN CONNECTION WITH THE REMOVAL ACTION CONDUCTED AT THE SITE. UNDER THE AGREEMENT, EPA WILL RECOVER COSTS PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST FROM THE SETTLING PARTIES.

Defendants (16)

• GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYNamed in settlement
• INTERNATIONAL CMP INDUSTRIES LTDNamed in settlement
• KRAMER CHEMICALS DIVISIONNamed in settlement
• MIRABITO FUEL GROUPNamed in settlement
• MONSEY PRODUCTS CONamed in settlement
• ST-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS FK-NORTONNamed in settlement
• TUMBLE FORMS INCNamed in settlement
• U.S. DEPT OF ARMYNamed in settlement
• W.R. GRACE & CONamed in settlement
• FARRELL OIL CO INCNamed in settlement
• HASBRO INCNamed in settlement
• HERITAGE ENERGY CONamed in settlement
• BRAY TERMINALS INCNamed in settlement
• CRANE & COMPANY INCNamed in settlement
• DANIEL GREEN CONamed in settlement
• E+E(US) INCNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• BELL-FAB MFG CORP

  380 HUDSON RIVER RD, WATERFORD, NY, 121881914

  Registry ID: 110004460690

Statutes cited

• CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• BRAY TERMINALS INCentered 2001-09-06

  Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2001-06-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2001-07-20Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2001-09-06Final Order Issued
• 2001-09-06Enforcement Action Closed