EPA v. FOUR SEASONS CLEANERS
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
FOUR SEASONS FAILED TO PERFORM BIWEEKLY INSPECTION AND TO KEEP A LOG OF DATES WHEN DRY CLEANING SYSTEMS COMPONENTS WERE INSPECTED FOR PERCEPTIBLE LEAKS WHILE THE DRY CLEANING SYSTEM WAS IN OPERATION; FAILED TO MONITOR THE TEMPERATURE OF THE AIR-PERC GAS-VAPOR STREAM ON THE OUTLET SIDE OF THE REFRIGERATED CONDENSER ON A DRY-TO-DRY MACHINE AND TO MAINTAIN A 45 F OR LESS, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE AIR-PERC AND FAILED TO ADJUST/REPAIR THE DRY CLEANING SYSTEM OR CONTROL DEVICE TO MEET THE VALUES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 63.323(A), AS REQUIRED. * ccds case summary has a few words changed from the case initiation form. See the hard copy form in the file or the CCDS in the notes database forms system.
Defendants (1)
- FOUR SEASONS CLEANERSNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
FOUR SEASONS CLEANERS
2908 MARLTON AVENUE, PENNSAUKEN, NJ, 08105
Registry ID: 110007142181
Statutes cited
- CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants
Enforcement conclusions (1)
FOUR SEASONS CLEANERSentered 2003-12-24
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $1,600
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2001-09-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2001-10-04Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2003-12-24Final Order Issued
- 2003-12-24Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 8302
- Case number
- 02-2001-1267
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- AIR
- EPA region
- 02
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Hazardous Air Pollutants
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2001-1267 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.