EPA v. EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION (NC)
DOJ Declined
Case summary
FOCUSES ON VIOLATIONS RELATING TO DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO OBTAIN PSD PERMITS FOR TWO MAJOR MODIFICATIONS AT A FACILITY WHICH IT PREVIOUSLY OWNED IN PAULSBORO, NJ. THE REGION IS SEEKING PENALTY RELIEF ONLY. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IS BEING PURSUED WITH VALERO, THE CURRENT OWNER/OPERATOR. THIS MATTER IS A COMPONENT OF A NATIONAL MULTI-MEDIA CASE. TO BE FILE DIN VA OR TX. Action taken against several other ExxonMobil Refineries.
Defendants (1)
- EXXONMOBIL CORPORATIONNamed in complaint
Facilities (2)
EXXONMOBIL FKA-MOBIL OIL CORP
BILLINGSPORT RD, PAULSBORO, NJ, 08066
Registry ID: 110013698757
EXXONMOBIL FKA-MOBIL OIL CORP
BILLINGSPORT RD, PAULSBORO, NJ, 08066
Registry ID: 110013698757
Statutes cited
- CAA 173 — New Source Review Permit Requirements
- CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants
- CAA 165 — Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
- CAA 111 — New Source Performance Standards
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2001-03-30Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2001-03-30Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2005-10-11Enforcement Action Closed
- 2005-10-11Complaint Filed With Court
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 8160
- Case number
- 02-2001-0009
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- AIR
- EPA region
- 02
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- New Source Review Permit Requirements
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-2001-0009 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.