EPA v. ALLIEDSIGNAL & AMPHENOL
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Cost recovery
$166,705
Compliance action
$13,864,000
Case summary
PRE-REFERRAL SENT ON SEPTEMBER 30, 1996. THE REPORT IS INTENDED TO PREPARE EPA AND JUSTICE FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE U.S. AND THE PRPS AT THE SITE. WE EXPECT TO BEGIN NEGOTIATING A CONSENT DECREE WITH THE PRPS DURING THE WINTER OF 96 - 97 FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF REMEDIAL DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION FOR THE SITE. FACILITY NAME: RICHARDSON HILL SITE, SIDNEY, NY 13838 09/30/96 - PRE-REFERRAL PACKAGE SENT 09/30/97 - ROD SIGNED 09/22/98 - REFERRAL TO DOJ W/REQUEST TO LODGE CD/& FILE COMP THERE ARE 4 PRPS/ 2 SETTLING DEFENDANTS (OWNER) & THE PERFORMING DEFENDANTS. DOJ PARTICIPATED IN & WAS CON- SULTED THROUGHOUT THE SETTLEM'T NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN U.S. & THE SETTLING DEFENDANT CONCERNING THE CD. 02/16/99 - COMPLAINT FILED/CD LODGED (DOCKET REC'D COPY) 4 DEFENDANTS NAMED IN THE COMPLAINT. CASE NICKNAME (RICHARDSON HILL ROAD FROM DOJ REPORT) *AS OF 4/21/99 AWAITING CD ENTRY BY THE COURT.
Defendants (4)
- AMPHENOL CORPNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- ALLIEDSIGNAL INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- SPIZZIRI, ALEXANDRA V.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
- SPIZZIRI, JOHN A. SR.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
RICHARDSON HILL ROAD LANDFILL
RICHARDSON HILL ROAD, SIDNEY CENTER, NY, 13839
Registry ID: 110008010375
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
Enforcement conclusions (1)
ALLIEDSIGNAL INCentered 1999-06-04
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (7 milestones)
- 1996-09-23Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1996-09-30PRN Sent
- 1998-09-22Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1999-02-16Complaint Filed With Court
- 1999-02-17Final Order Lodged
- 1999-06-04Final Order Entered
- 1999-06-04Concluded
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 5794
- Case number
- 02-1996-0194
- DOJ docket
- 90-11-2-1225
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- NYSUP
- EPA region
- 02
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-1996-0194 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.