EPA v. ROYAL LYNCH
Source Agrees
Case summary
ENFORCE A CERCLA SECTION 122(E)(3)(B) SUBPOENA. THE ACTION SEEKS A DISTRICT COURT ORDER, ORDERING A DEPONENT TO COMPLY WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS ISSUED UNDER CERCLA, AND TO APPEAR AT A DEPOSITION TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY REGARDING THE BERN METALS SUPERFUND SITE. EPA SEEKS A COURT ORDER, ORDERING DEPONENT TO COMPLY W/THE SUBPOENA, & SPECIFING THE PENALTIES FOR CONTEMPT IF DEPONENT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER. THERE IS ONE PROPOSED DEFENDANT (PRP) (DEPONENT) A FORMER EMPLOYEE AT THE SITE, WHERE THE U.S. EPA EXPENDED OVER $2,000,000 IN RESPONSE COSTS, AND IT IS BELIEVED THAT HIS TESTIMONY WILL BE HELPFUL IN COST RECOVERY NEGOTIATION, ALLOCATION, AND POTENTIALLY, SETTLEMENT.
Defendants (1)
- ROYAL LYNCHNamed in complaint
Facilities (1)
BERN METALS - USEPA ERRD
22 BENDER AVE, BUFFALO, NY, 142062803
Registry ID: 110004451600
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122E3B — Violation of 122(e)(3)(B) Subpoena
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1994-03-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1995-05-30Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1995-08-18Complaint Filed With Court
- 1995-09-06Concluded
- 1995-09-06Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 5550
- Case number
- 02-1995-0354
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- NYSUP
- EPA region
- 02
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Violation of 122(e)(3)(B) Subpoena
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-1995-0354 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.