Skip to main content
02-1995-0354JudicialClosedFY 1995· Region 02

EPA v. ROYAL LYNCH

Source Agrees

Case summary

ENFORCE A CERCLA SECTION 122(E)(3)(B) SUBPOENA. THE ACTION SEEKS A DISTRICT COURT ORDER, ORDERING A DEPONENT TO COMPLY WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS ISSUED UNDER CERCLA, AND TO APPEAR AT A DEPOSITION TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY REGARDING THE BERN METALS SUPERFUND SITE. EPA SEEKS A COURT ORDER, ORDERING DEPONENT TO COMPLY W/THE SUBPOENA, & SPECIFING THE PENALTIES FOR CONTEMPT IF DEPONENT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER. THERE IS ONE PROPOSED DEFENDANT (PRP) (DEPONENT) A FORMER EMPLOYEE AT THE SITE, WHERE THE U.S. EPA EXPENDED OVER $2,000,000 IN RESPONSE COSTS, AND IT IS BELIEVED THAT HIS TESTIMONY WILL BE HELPFUL IN COST RECOVERY NEGOTIATION, ALLOCATION, AND POTENTIALLY, SETTLEMENT.

Defendants (1)

  • ROYAL LYNCHNamed in complaint

Facilities (1)

  • BERN METALS - USEPA ERRD

    22 BENDER AVE, BUFFALO, NY, 142062803

    Registry ID: 110004451600

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 122E3BViolation of 122(e)(3)(B) Subpoena

Timeline (5 milestones)

  • 1994-03-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1995-05-30Referred To Dept Of Justice
  • 1995-08-18Complaint Filed With Court
  • 1995-09-06Concluded
  • 1995-09-06Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
5550
Case number
02-1995-0354
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
NYSUP
EPA region
02
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Violation of 122(e)(3)(B) Subpoena

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-1995-0354 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.