Skip to main content
02-1989-0406JudicialConcludedFY 1989· Region 02

EPA v. VINELAND CHEMICAL CO & SCHWERDTLE, A. & M.

Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery

Cost recovery

$76,000,000

Case summary

THE SITE CONSISTS OF THE VINELAND CHEMICAL CO. PLANT SITE; THE RIVER AREAS, INCLUDING THE BLACKWATER BRANCH, THE MAURICE RIVER BETWEEN THE BLACKWATER BRANCH AND UNION LAKE; AN 870-ACRE IMPOUNDMENT ON THE MAURICE RIVER, OWNED BY THE NJDEP. SIGNIFICANT ARSENIC CONTAMINATION OF THE GROUNDWATER, SOILS AND SEDIMENT AT THE SITE HAS BEEN DETECTED. THE CONTAMINATION POSES A SERIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM AND A HUMAN HEALTH RISK. EXTENSIVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN GATHERED REGARDING THE CONTAMINATION IN ALL THREE AREAS OF THE SITE IN THE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY. A RECORD OF DECISION WAS SIGNED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 BY EPA. THE PROPOSED DEFENDANTS IN THIS LITIGATION ARE MR. AND MRS. SCHWERDTLE, THE OWNERS AND OPERATORS, AND VINELAND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. EPA WILL SEND DEMAND LETTERS FOR RE- IMBURSEMENT OF PAST COSTS TO THE ABOVE LISTED PARTIES AFTER SEPTEMBER 29, 1989. MOREOVER, THE SCHWERDTLES HAVE FAILED TO CLOSE TWO IMPOUNDMENTS REGULATED UNDER RCRA WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF TWO FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS. THIS ACTION SEEKS RECOVERY OF ALL PAST COSTS INCURRED BY EPA IN CONNECTION WITH THE SITE, AS WELL AS INTEREST AND ALL COLLECTION COSTS. THE ACTION ALSO SEEKS A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHING THE LIABILITY OF THE PROPOSED DEFENDANTS FOR ALL FUTURE COSTS WHICH EPA MAY INCUR WITH RESPECT TO THE SITE. THE CASE FOR PAST COSTS AND A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS BEING REFERRED FOR EXPEDITIOUS FILING SO THAT THE UNITED STATES WILL BE ABLE TO COLLECT SOME SMALL PORTION OF THE SIGNIFICANT COSTS RESULTING FROM THE ARSENIC CONTAMINATION AT THE SITE. SHOULD BE GIVEN IMMEDIATE PRIORITY BY DOJ AND THE EPA SINCE IT INCLUDES A CLAIM FOR THE FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS TO AVOID PAYMENT OF COSTS AT THE SITE. DEFENDANT A. SCHWERDTLE WAS NAMED IN ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. A. SCHWERDTLE IS DECEASED (2/91). THEREFORE, M. SCHWERDLTE AS THE EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE IS THE SUBSTITUTED PARTY.

Defendants (9)

  • ESTATE OF ARTHUR SCHWERDTLENamed in settlement
  • GANZ, DAVIDNamed in settlement
  • GANZ, SHARONNamed in settlement
  • SCHWERDTLE, A.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
  • SCHWERDTLE, M.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
  • SPITZER, ROBERTANamed in settlement
  • TRUSTEE FOR TRUST ANamed in settlement
  • VINELAND CHEMICAL INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
  • TRUSTEE FOR TRUST BNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • VINELAND CHEMICAL COMPANY INCORPORATED

    1611 WEST WHEAT ROAD, VINELAND, NJ, 08360

    Registry ID: 110000615772

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 107ACost Recovery

Enforcement conclusions (2)

  • VINELAND CHEMICAL COMP., ET ALentered 1994-02-07

    Primary law: CERCLA

  • FIRST NATIONAL BANK, ET ALentered 1996-12-06

    Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (6 milestones)

  • 1989-09-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1989-09-29Referred To Dept Of Justice
  • 1990-04-20Complaint Filed With Court
  • 1996-12-06Final Order Lodged
  • 1996-12-06Final Order Entered
  • 1996-12-06Concluded

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
3698
Case number
02-1989-0406
DOJ docket
90-11-2-485A
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
NJSUP
EPA region
02
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Cost Recovery

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 02-1989-0406 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.