EPA v. SUEZ SPRINGFIELD WWTF
Case summary
On July 9, 2019, Region 1 reached a Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO) with SUEZ Water Environmental Services Inc. for a violation of the Clean Air Act's General Duty Clause (GDC), specifically of the GDC's requirement to prevent chemical releases by designing and maintaining a safe facility. The company operates the Springfield Wastewater Treatment Facility, which uses chlorine, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, methanol, and potassium permanganate. The CAFO alleges that the company violated the GDC by storing incompatible chemicals and materials together in a manner that risked fire or toxic releases. The CAFO requires payment of a $20,900 penalty. The General Duty Clause is not delegated to any New England state, but EPA will provide a copy of the CAFO to state and local officials.
Defendants (1)
- Suez Water Environmental ServicesNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
SPRINGFIELD DPW
70 TAPLEY STREET, SPRINGFIELD, MA, 01104-2802
Registry ID: 110013854267
Statutes cited
- CAA 112[R][1] — Prevention of Accidental Release/General Duty Clause
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SUEZ SPRINGFIELD WWTFentered 2019-07-09
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $20,900
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2019-07-09Final Order Issued
- 2019-07-09Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2019-07-22Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3601909460
- Case number
- 01-2019-1005
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 01
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Prevention of Accidental Release/General Duty Clause
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2019-1005 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.