EPA v. DANIEL SANBORN

Case summary

On June 28, 2017, Region 1 issued a Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO) both initiating and resolving an action for violations of TSCA and the Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule against Daniel Sanborn, a general contracting business in Bow, New Hampshire. The action, which will help reduce childhood exposure to lead paint, stems from Sanborn?s violations of lead-safe work practice requirements while performing renovation work on the exterior of a two-family home occupied by a child under the age of six. Under the CAFO, Daniel Sanborn will pay a penalty of $6,100 and come into compliance with the RRP Rule. The case was referred to EPA as the result of a tip by a neighbor. The action was not part of a National Enforcement Initiative.

Defendants (1)

• Daniel SanbornNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• DANIEL SANBORN

  7 MORGAN DR, BOW, NH, 03309

  Registry ID: 110070106380

Statutes cited

• TSCA 402C — Lead: RRP
• TSCA 406B — Lead: Pre-Renovation Education Rule

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• DANIEL SANBORNentered 2017-06-27

  Primary law: TSCA

  Federal penalty: $6,100

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2017-06-27Final Order Issued
• 2017-06-27Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2017-09-07Enforcement Action Data Entered