Skip to main content
01-2012-4005Administrative - FormalFinal Order IssuedFY 2012· Region 01

EPA v. BIOSENSORY INSECT CONTROL

Final Order With Penalty

Case summary

On March 7, 2013, EPA Region 1 filed a Consent Agreement and Final Order (“CAFO”) to resolve an administrative penalty case against BioSensory Inc. (“BioSensory”), a Delaware Corporation. The CAFO requires BioSensory to pay a $50,000 monetary penalty to resolve numerous past violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), as alleged in a complaint Region 1 filed on June 28, 2012. The violations include 1) failure to file annual reports disclosing the type and amount of each pesticide product produced sold or distributed; 2) importation of hundreds of pesticides/devices into the United States without submitting the required reports (Notices Of Arrival or “NOAs”) with EPA; 3) distributed or sold misbranded pesticides/devices that did not display a valid EPA establishment registration number; and 4) distributed or sold registered pesticides/devices for an unregistered use. The settlement will encourage regulatory compliance and help to ensure that pesticides and pesticide devices are not sold or used in a manner that poses unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.

Defendants (1)

  • BIOSENSORY INSECT CONTROLNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • BIOSENSORY INSECT CONTROL

    107 PROVIDENCE STREET, PUTNAM, CT, 06260

    Registry ID: 110038248027

Statutes cited

  • FIFRA 12A1FDevice Misbranded
  • FIFRA 12A2LEstablishment Registration
  • FIFRA 12A1BClaim Difference
  • FIFRA 12A2NFailure to File Reports

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • BIOSENSORY INSECT CONTROLentered 2013-03-07

    Primary law: FIFRA

    Federal penalty: $50,000

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2011-10-26Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2012-06-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2013-03-07Final Order Issued

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
2600070133
Case number
01-2012-4005
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
01
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Device Misbranded

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2012-4005 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.