EPA v. ANALAB LABORATORIES
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
ANALAB MANUFACTURES AND DISTRIBUTES CLEANING SUPPLIES. ITS EPA-APPROVED LABELS FOR TWO PRODUCTS, CITRON AND PENTA PINE, INDICATED THEY WERE EFFFECTIVE AT PARTICULAR CONCENTRATIONS OF PSEUDOMOAS AERUGINOSA-BACTERIA IMPLICATED IN SOME NONSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS. EPA TESTNG SHOWED THAT SAMPLES OF CITRON AND PENTA PINE WERE NOT EFFECTIVE IN THOSE CONCENTRATIONS. THUS, THE PRODUCTS WERE MISBRANDED, CAUSING THE POTENTIAL OF BACTERIAL INFECTIONS DESPITE EFFORTS BY THE PURCHASER OF THE PRODUCT. AFTER BEING INFORMED OF THE TESTING, ANALAB WITHDREW THOSE PRODUCTS FROM THE MARKET. THIS ACTION IS TO SEEK PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, TO DETER ANALAB OR OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED FROM SELLING PRODUCTS WHICH WERE NOT EFFECTIVE AT THE CONCENTRATIONS SHOWN ON THE LABELS.
Defendants (1)
- ANALAB LABORATORIESNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ANALAB INCORPORATED
59 DAVIS AVE., NORWOOD, MA, 02062
Registry ID: 110002086607
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1E — Adulterated/Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
ANALAB LABORATORIESentered 2005-11-22
Primary law: FIFRA
Federal penalty: $11,000
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2004-10-19Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2005-09-22Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2005-11-22Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 134074
- Case number
- 01-2005-4001
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 01
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Adulterated/Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2005-4001 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.