EPA v. DREW EASTON
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
THIS IS THE SECOND COMPLIANCE ORDER ISSUED TO DREW EASTON REGARDING ITS SOLVENT DEGREASING MACHINES. THE FIRST ORDER, ISSUED TOGETHER WITH A NOTICE OF VIOLATION IN JUNE 2004, CONCERNED DREW-EASTON'S OLD MACHINE, WHICH VIOLATED VARIOUS EQUIPMENT, MONITORING, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS CONTAINED IN FEDERAL OR FEDERALLY -ENFORCABLE STATE (SIP) REGULATIONS. IN RESPONSE, DREW EASTON INSTALLED A NEW DEGREASER, BUT THIS MACHINE STILL VIOLATED PREVIOUSLY CITED SIP REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND MONITORING. THE SECOND COMPLIANCE ORDER PUTS DREW EASTON ON A SCHEDULE TO INSTALL THE REMAINING REQUIRED EPQUIPMENT BY NO LATER THAN MAY 26,2005.
Defendants (1)
- DREW EASTONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
DREW EASTON
1725 PONTIAC AVE, CRANSTON, RI, 02920
Registry ID: 110004900527
Statutes cited
- CAA 110 — Implementation Plan for National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards
Enforcement conclusions (1)
DREW EASTONentered 2005-01-11
Primary law: CAA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2004-10-19Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2005-01-11Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2005-01-11Final Order Issued
- 2005-05-13Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 134028
- Case number
- 01-2005-1001
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 01
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Implementation Plan for National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2005-1001 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.