EPA v. STARMET CORPORATION / NUCLEAR METALS SITE
Final Order With Unspecified Cost Recovery
Case summary
Second amendment addressing additional cost in the performance of RI/FS work. On 6/13/2003 the original Cost was determined to be $8,000,000. This amount was amended to $14,000,000 on 02/13/2008. On 10/02/12 a second amendment adding $2,000,000. raising the cost to $16,000,000.
Defendants (1)
- STARMET CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
NUCLEAR METALS SUPERFUND SITE
2229 MAIN ST, CONCORD, MA, 01742
Registry ID: 110000309452
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122G — Administrative De Minimis Settlement
- CERCLA 122A — Agreement to Perform Work Under 104B
- CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
- CERCLA 122D3 — Violation of Existing AO or CD
Enforcement conclusions (3)
STARMET CORPORATION / NUCLEAR METALS SITEentered 2008-02-13
Primary law: CERCLA
STARMET CORPORATION / NUCLEAR METALS SITEentered 2012-10-02
Primary law: CERCLA
STARMET CORPORATION / NUCLEAR METALS SITEentered 2003-06-13
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2003-06-13Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2003-06-17Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2012-10-02Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 97441
- Case number
- 01-2003-0062
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 01
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Administrative De Minimis Settlement
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2003-0062 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.