EPA v. ROLPH C HAGEN (USA) CORP
Case summary
IN MARCH 2003, APPROXIMATELY TWELVE MONTHS AFTER SETTLING A PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION FOR THE SAME ACTIVITY (IN RE: HAGEN, DOCKET NO. FIFRA-01-2001-0052), HAGEN IMPORTED A SHIPMENT OF MISBRANDED ULTRA VIOLET (UV) STERILIZER/CLARIFIER DEVICES FROM ITALY IN VIOLATION OF FIFRA. THESE DEVICES ARE DESIGNED TO CONTROL, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ALGAE IN FISH PONDS. THE DEVICES WERE MISBRANDED IN THAT THEIR PACKAGING DID NOT CONTAIN THE EPA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBER OF THE FACILITY IN WHICH THEY WERE PRODUCED. THE COMPANY VOLUNTARILY NOTIFIED EPA OF THE VIOLATION WHEN THE SHIPMENT OF THESE MISLABELED DEVICES WAS DELIVERED TO ITS MANSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS FACILITY. THIS ACTION APPEARS TO HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO ERRORS BY THE ITALIAN MANUFACTURER AND MISCOMMUNICATION BETWEEN HAGEN AND ITS CONTRACTOR.
Defendants (1)
- ROLPH C HAGEN (USA) CORPNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ROLF C. HAGEN (U.S.A.) CORP
50 HAMPDEN ROAD, MANSFIELD, MA, 02048-1808
Registry ID: 110011803441
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
ROLPH C HAGEN (USA) CORPentered 2003-04-22
Primary law: FIFRA
Federal penalty: $5,500
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2003-04-22Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2003-04-22Final Order Issued
- 2003-06-12Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 97144
- Case number
- 01-2003-0057
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 01
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2003-0057 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.