EPA v. PLASMA TECHNOLOGY INC
Compliance action
$17,000
Case summary
FACILITY FAILED TO INSTALL PROPER CONTROLS OR MAINTAIN REQUIRED RECORDS. FACILITY HAD NOT NOTIFIED EPA OF ITS VAPOR DEGREASER. FACILILTY MADE THE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT UPGRADES AND BEGAN KEEPING RECORDS. RE: CCDS QUESTION #19: FACILITY ESTIMATES ITS ANNUAL USAGE WILL BE 3600 POUNDS. SINCE NO RECORDS WERE KEPT BEFORE, FACILITY DOES NOT KNOW HOW MUCH PERC IT WAS USING PER YEAR. PROGRAM CONTACT CANNOT SAY HOW MUCH OF A REDUCTION IN PERC THERE WILL BE, BUT THERE WILL BE SOME SINCE THEY NOW HAVE CONTROLS.
Defendants (1)
- PLASMA TECHNOLOGY INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PLASMA TECHNOLOGY INC
70 RYE ST, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT, 060741218
Registry ID: 110002353275
Statutes cited
- CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PLASMA TECHNOLOGY INCentered 2000-10-26
Primary law: CAA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2000-10-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2000-10-26Final Order Issued
- 2001-05-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 1506
- Case number
- 01-2001-0051
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- OES
- EPA region
- 01
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Hazardous Air Pollutants
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2001-0051 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.