Skip to main content
01-2000-0054JudicialConcludedFY 2000· Region 01

EPA v. KAPP/KASTER/WEBB

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

MR KAPP, MR KASTER, AND MR WEBB WON A JUDGMENT AGAINST RAYMARK YEARS AGO, AND TO SECURE THEIR $100,000 JUDGMENT, PUT A LIEN AGAINST THE RAYMARK FACILITY. EPA LATER PUT ITS OWN LIEN AGAINST RAYMARK AND FORECLOSED ON ITS LIEN. IN ORDER TO SELL THE FACILITY AND OBTAIN SOME OF THE MONEY OWED TO IT, EPA NEEDED TO RESOLVE THE FIRST LIEN, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE JACOBS & CRUMPLER LIEN AFTER THE NAME OF THE LAW FIRM REPRESENTING THE THREE MEN WITH THE EARLIER CLAIM AGAINST RAYMARK. THE THREE MEN AGREED TO RELEASE THEIR LIEN IN EXCHANGE FOR A PAYMENT OF $750,000 FROM EPA. EPA DOES NOT CONSIDER THE THREE MEN TO BE PRPS, BUT LODGED A COMPLAINT ONLY AS A MEANS TO BRING THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT BEFORE THE COURT FOR ITS APPROVAL.

Defendants (3)

  • KAPPNamed in settlement
  • KASTERNamed in settlement
  • WEBBNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

    75 EAST MAIN STREET, STRATFORD, CT, 06497

    Registry ID: 110000610919

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 107Superfund

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • KAPP/KASTER/WEBBentered 2000-01-18

    Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (6 milestones)

  • 1999-12-28Referred To Dept Of Justice
  • 1999-12-28Complaint Filed With Court
  • 1999-12-28Final Order Lodged
  • 2000-01-18Final Order Entered
  • 2000-01-18Concluded
  • 2000-05-16Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
1251
Case number
01-2000-0054
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
OES
EPA region
01
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Superfund

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2000-0054 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.