Skip to main content
01-2000-0053JudicialConcludedFY 2000· Region 01

EPA v. LEACH FAMILY HOLDINGS (RAYMARK)

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

DURING THE REMEDIATION OF THE RAYMARK FACILITY, LEACH SPENT APPROXIMATELY $3,500,000 CONSTRUCTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SAME TIME. EPA WAS REMEDIATING THE FACILITY. THIS INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCED THE VALUE OF THE FACILITY AND WILL ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF THE FACILITY TO PROCEED MORE RAPIDLY. EPA HAS LODGED A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH LEACH THAT IF APPROVED BY THE COURT WILL HAVE EPA PAY LEACH $1,500,000 FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS LEACH MADE, AND TO RESOLVE ANY CLAIMS LEACH AND EPA MIGHT HAVE AGAINST ONE ANOTHER. EPA DOES NOT CONSIDER LEACH TO BE A LIABLE PARTY AND HAS FILED A COMPLAINT ONLY TO BRING THE SETTLEMENT BEFORE THE COURT FOR ITS APPROVAL.

Defendants (1)

  • LEACH FAMILY HOLDINGSNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

    75 EAST MAIN STREET, STRATFORD, CT, 06497

    Registry ID: 110000610919

Statutes cited

  • CERCLA 107Superfund

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • LEACH FAMILY HOLDINGSentered 2000-10-10

    Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (6 milestones)

  • 2000-01-04Referred To Dept Of Justice
  • 2000-01-18Final Order Lodged
  • 2000-01-18Complaint Filed With Court
  • 2000-05-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2000-10-10Final Order Entered
  • 2000-10-10Concluded

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
1250
Case number
01-2000-0053
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
CER
Branch
OES
EPA region
01
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Superfund

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2000-0053 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.