EPA v. STRATFORD TOWN OF_(RAYMARK)
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
THIS IS A SETTLEMENT WITH THE TOWN OF STRATFORD. EPA DOES NOT CONSIDER STATFROD TO BE A LLIABLE PARTY AND DID NOT SEND THE TOWN A PRP NOTICE LETTER OR FILE SUIT AGAINST THE TOWN. RAYMARK BROUGHT THE TOWN IN AS A THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT AFTER THE US AND THE STATE OF CT SUED RAYMARK. THE U.S. SETTLED WITH THE TOWN FOR APPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION SO THAT THE TOWN COULD OBTAIN CONTRIBUTION PROTECTION AND BE SHIELDED AGAINST PROTRACTED LITIGATION.
Defendants (1)
- STRATFORD, TOWN OFNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
75 EAST MAIN STREET, STRATFORD, CT, 06497
Registry ID: 110000610919
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107 — Superfund
Enforcement conclusions (1)
STRATFORD TOWN OFentered 2000-04-26
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (6 milestones)
- 2000-02-02Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2000-02-18Final Order Lodged
- 2000-02-18Complaint Filed With Court
- 2000-04-26Final Order Entered
- 2000-04-26Concluded
- 2000-05-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 1249
- Case number
- 01-2000-0052
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- OES
- EPA region
- 01
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Superfund
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-2000-0052 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.