EPA v. GILBERT & BENNETT MANUFACTURING CO
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Cost recovery
$40,000
Case summary
GILBERT & BENNETT MANUFACTURING COMPANY OWES EPA MONEY PURSUANT TO A CERCLA 122H AGREEMENT WHICH RESOLVED THEIR LIABILITY AT THE HARCO SUPERFUND REMOVAL SITE IN WILTON, CT. GILBERT & BENNETT WAS ALSO UNDERTAKING RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION AT THEIR GEORGETOWN, CT SITE. THE COMPANY WENT INTO BANKRUPTCY. THIS ACTION IS TO 1)RECOVER MONEY OWED PURSUANT TOTHE 122H AGREEMENT, AND 2)PRESERVE FUNDS FOR THE RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION.
Defendants (1)
- GILBERT & BENNETT MANUFACTURING CONamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
GILBERT & BENNETT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
1 NORTH MAIN STREET, GEORGETOWN, CT, 06829
Registry ID: 110000610777
Statutes cited
- RCRA 3008H — Interim Status Corrective Action Order
- CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Enforcement conclusions (2)
GILBERT & BENNETTentered 2002-11-19
Primary law: CERCLA
GILBERT & BENNET MANUFACTURINGentered 1999-11-18
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (6 milestones)
- 1998-12-08Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1998-12-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1999-11-18Complaint Filed With Court
- 2002-11-19Final Order Lodged
- 2002-11-19Final Order Entered
- 2002-11-19Concluded
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 999
- Case number
- 01-1999-0007
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- SES
- EPA region
- 01
- Multimedia
- Yes
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Interim Status Corrective Action Order
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-1999-0007 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.