EPA v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION II
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$4,251,910
Case summary
UTC HAS DISCHARGED THROUGH FOUR OUTFALLS W/OUT A PERMIT, MISDIRECTED EFFLUENT TO RECEIVING WATERS OTHER THAN THOSE IN PERMIT, AND HAS BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR NUMEROUS SPILLS AT SIX PRATT & WHITNEY FACILITIES. EACH FACILITY HAS ALSO VIOLATED IT NPDES PERMIT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS.
Defendants (1)
- UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (3)
PRATT & WHITNEY
400 MAIN STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT, 061081888
Registry ID: 110017435701
PRATT & WHITNEY CPD
45 NEWELL ST, SOUTHINGTON, CT, 06489
Registry ID: 110000610642
PRATT & WHITNEY ROCKY HILL
60 BELAMOSE AVE, ROCKY HILL, CT, 06067
Registry ID: 110000610660
Statutes cited
- CWA 402 — Clean Water Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION IIentered 1993-10-19
Primary law: CWA
Federal penalty: $4,251,910
Timeline (6 milestones)
- 1991-01-07Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1991-03-13Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1993-09-23Complaint Filed With Court
- 1993-10-19Final Order Lodged
- 1993-10-19Final Order Entered
- 1993-10-19Concluded
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 236
- Case number
- 01-1991-0016
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- WAT
- EPA region
- 01
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Clean Water Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 01-1991-0016 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.